Pet's Slavery Rant

The notion of consentual slavery is a romantic one. To be available, to be used, any hole any time by your Master. To be there for his pleasure, some suggest you should have no limits, no boundaries, and most certainly you should have no rights. You give up everything and place yourself in the care of one person, and trust that they will make the best decisions for you. I would contend that most who are actual slaves have put themselves in a position where they feel used, rather than useful, by choosing sadistic D-types.

You find those who try and educate new comers about the reality of consentual slavery. It's not about the kink they say. It's not the "lightweight" roleplaying of those who dabble in being Dominant/submissive. It's real. Being beaten, raped, shared, used. Being retrained so harshly that your body is left bleeding and broken. If you meet a compatible Master, what need is there for breaking? You will simply obey his needs and punishments will be far and few between. It is only if your Master is sadistic that you will endure beatings for his pleasure. Indeed if you take out the kink, the sadism, the masochism, you have a fairly vanilla 1950's style marriage, and you would be no less subservient to your Master.

Don't get me wrong I have the desire for pain, for humiliation and degradation, but I own those desires, I don't endure them for the sake of my Master's pleasure. For s-types who are masochistic obviously the smartest choice is a sadistic D-type, but then they aren't enduring anything really are they?

It's about the level of commitment they say, D/s relationships can't know the depth of trust that an M/s relationship has. I call bullshit. If you are in a committed loving relationship where knowing each other as people, loving each other as people is as important as knowing the person who is going to be paddling your arse that evening, then why isn't the trust there? If you are only dabbling with a weekend play partner of course you won't go as far, surrender as much, as what you would with someone you were in love with. Giving yourself has nothing to do with the labels you place upon yourself, it has to do with the depth of feeling in your heart and soul, no label on your relationship can make that happen.

I personally feel I can no more call myself a slave because I am submissive than I can call myself a hobbit because I have hairy feet. So many s-types get into a pissing contest... I am a real slave because I provide toilet service, I am a real slave because I get shared with his friends, I am a real slave because I allow my Master to degrade me more than you allow yours, I am a real slave because... ugh

Why do we judge other's for how they label themselves? Why can't we just be who we are without having to feel better about ourselves by belittling another?

I don't wish to be a slave, but I do still feeling owned... more importantly like I belong... I ask to be referred to as "pet". For us this doesnt involve animal roleplay, I don't do puppy or kitty play per se, although some elements like being referred to as bitch, eating from a pet bowl at times get me hot... but as I see it this is how many other s-types are treated regardless of how they choose to identify and it is not specifically restricted to petplay.

I have read a lot of posts on the boards from Masters who claim that with their slave they can do anything, and the slave has no right to object, no right to disobey, they can beat the slave mercilessly if they choose, am sure you have read them too. They justify it with analogies about cars or dogs, and when I thought about the dog and mistreatment, I thought would not the dog bite back?

That's when I knew I was happier being treated as/thought of as a pet, rather than a slave. I get all the benefits of ownership, of shelter, protection, love etc. I am loyal, faithful, dependable, obedient, but I also have a set of teeth. I can and will bite if you keep prodding me with the same stick repeatedly and I will piss in your shoes if you make me unhappy.